A few weeks ago, while waiting to start the Highlander (Regis' student paper) meeting, I decided to show the SNL spoof of Sarah Palin's interview with Katie Couric. For the most part, the fifteen in the room were able to let out a good laugh, even the McCain-Palin supporters. Yet, I noticed a few students looking a bit uncomfortable. These students were fidgety, flustered, even a bit snide in their responses during the meeting. In part, I was a little surprised--and not for seeming "biased," I expected that; but because ironically enough, these students hadn't seen the original interview. (I found out a few days later, sadly enough, that the same students happen to think McCain will save the world. Seriously.)
Now in all fairness, I'd expect a similar response from Obama-Biden supporters had I shown the SNL spoof on the first presidential debate. But, of course, all of the staff watched the real thing. And though I'm sure there are some Obama fans on my staff who think he'll save the world too, they, having watched the real debate, are a different argument all together.
See, what worries me about some of my fellow youth voters is their "selective ignorance." Although I admit to reading more news and perspectives that favor my candidate, I know it would be irresponsible of me not to also consider other and all points of view, including those that highly regard the other candidate. So, I keep my options open. Otherwise, there's no conversation to be had, or at least, an intellectually grounded one, at that.