Chertoff: the Southwest border fence will improve the environment, not hurt it.

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff listens to questions at a news conference at the closing of the Mexico U.S. Border Conference in Puerto Penasco, Mexico, Friday, Sept. 28, 2007. (Photo: Guillermo Arias/AP)
U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff listens to questions at a news conference at the closing of the Mexico U.S. Border Conference in Puerto Penasco, Mexico, Friday, Sept. 28, 2007. (Photo: Guillermo Arias/AP)

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff on Monday defended the construction of a fence along the southwest border, saying it's actually better for the environment than what happens when people illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico line.

"Illegal migrants really degrade the environment. I've seen pictures of human waste, garbage, discarded bottles and other human artifact in pristine areas," Chertoff said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press. "And believe me, that is the worst thing you can do to the environment."

To curb illegal immigration, the U.S. government plans to complete 370 miles of fencing and put 200 miles of vehicle barriers on the southwest border by the end of 2008. But this has brought complaints that the fence and barriers are harmful to the environment.

Chertoff said the department exceeded its goal to complete 150 miles of fencing along the Mexican border by the end of the 2007 fiscal year, which was Sunday.

Last month, Chertoff said there was glitch in a "virtual fence" — a 28-mile stretch of surveillance technologies near the border southwest of Tucson — and he would not pay the contractor, Boeing Co., until that was resolved. The technologies were not all working together so that images caught on radar could be sent to a Border Patrol agent monitoring the system, Chertoff said Monday.

But he also said the problem "appears to be getting fixed" and Chertoff said the program will undergo its final testing phase over the next 30 days.

"I've seen this kind of system work in other settings, so it's not a novel or a technologically difficult task," the secretary said Monday. "But because it is complicated, and because it's a demanding environment, we just weren't comfortable that we were happy with the way it was working."

Wildlife enthusiasts fear that the natural wonders of the Rio Grande Valley in Texas could be spoiled by fences and barriers and could harm some animals by cutting them off from the only source of fresh water.

Wild cats, reptiles and at least 500 species of birds attract visitors from around the world who bring the impoverished region $150 million a year.

The Homeland Security agency has said that such environmental concerns will be taken into account as the fence construction proceeds.




Is it Right or Wrong?

I am in the middle of this situation. I don't know if is right or wrong. I think is right only for one reason. This will make it harder for immgrants to try to cross the border so they will just give up and not even try and that would make the records on deaths in the dessert go down. At the same time it bothers me to know that the government well basically the United States are more worried about the animals not having water than the humans that are dying of hunger and dehidration.THey should be building that fence for their (the immigrants) own good not for our good. THEY ARE NOT HARMING ANYONE.