Grueskin is CoDA's enforcer

Kudos to the Denver Post for its continuing series on the Colorado Democracy Alliance, high command of the political left for strategy and finance.  Today's article, the Post's third by my count since Face the State.com broke this story with its "educate the idiots" scoop, mentions CoDA attorney Mark Grueskin but doesn't do justice to his huge role in this success story.

Grueskin is a one-man suing machine who turns up everywhere when the Dems and "progressives" need to attack, defend, delay, or harass on campaigns of any kind.  He deserves his very own box, a big one, on the CoDA organizational chart.

This seems to have gone virtually unreported except for, once again, those incorrigibles over at Face the State. Here's their complete report on Mark Grueskin, of whom the always quotable Jon Caldara says, “If you want to tangle up your enemies and suck up all their money you hire Grueskin.” 

FTS notes that Mark's win record isn't the greatest, so maybe his clients aren't getting their money's worth.  Then again maybe they are, if stall and distraction are the goal.  I'm one of the many who have been on the receiving end of that.

If you're keeping a file on CoDA's takeover of our state and its likely rollout to many other states, be sure to include the Weekly Standard cover story from this past July 21 by Fred Barnes, their executive editor.  His title says it all: "The Colorado Model: The Democrats' Plan for Turning Red States Blue."

What a great time to be a conservative Republican.  The other side's overconfidence will soon be at full ripeness for our counterattack.  Now if we just had two nickels to rub together, and a legal counsel like Grueskin, the Steely Dan of litigators...


Education for Andrew's "idiots" at Face the State.

My hats off to Mr. Menezes for exposing Andrews and the Face the State liars. Its a "great time to be a conservative Republican" says Andrews. He's ready to "counter-attack". Right. Is this like "education for his idiotic" following.

More misinformation from John Andrews

What Andrews blithely leaves out here speaks volumes: He's praising articles based on documents that were stolen, and a featured memo that turned out to be fake, yet he omits both of these facts. What does that tell you about Andrews' standards when it comes to the truth?

Read more here:

http://colorado.mediamatters.org/items/200810160001

Bill Menezes
Editorial Director
Colorado Media Matters